Yay or nay?
Discover what the internet is saying about Natural Cycles.
Upgraded Reviews scanned the web to find out what real users are saying about Natural Cycles.
See the highlights below and decide for yourself!
Table of contents
- ✅ Pros
- ❌ Cons
- ⚖️ Summaries
- 💸 Top Discount
✅ Pros
“With just that little three-minute ritual each morning, I was setting aside that time to tell my body that it mattered.”
“It can be used to help prevent or plan for pregnancies.”
“It is a natural birth control solution with no side effects.”
“It seems like using Natural Cycles is a great way for me to clear my body of hormones, and get a glimpse into my fertility to boot.”
“Using the Natural Cycles method means having to communicate openly with my partner as to where I am in my cycle. This has cultivated a deeper sense of trust and intimacy.”
“It is very functional app, easy to navigate.”
“FDA-cleared non-hormonal birth control method that involves measuring your basal temperature daily to track ovulation through an app.”
“Studies show it is effective.”
“There are no side effects.”
“According to the company, it is suitable for people with longer and shorter than average cycles.”
“It allows different profiles for birth control and planning pregnancies.”
“It has FDA clearance.”
“Research suggests it’s effective.”
“The app algorithm uses this information to predict a fertile window for contraceptive or pregnancy planning purposes.”
“It can track other information, like PMS, libido, and mood changes.”
“It is FDA-cleared.”
“With regular basal body temperature monitoring, this app should reliably track ovulation.”
💸 Top Current Discount
❌ Cons
“It does not consider other factors affecting fertility, including stress and illness.”
“It costs money, unlike some other tracking apps.”
“It requires continuous use for the best results.”
“A specific thermometer is required for basal temperature monitoring.”
“This app seems rather costly for the services offered.”
“When you first start using Natural Cycles, it takes a few months for it to get to know your cycle.”
“It can take a few cycles before it can most accurately predict your fertile or non-fertile days.”
“This app is unlikely to be as reliable when used for contraceptive purposes if you have a very irregular menstrual cycle.”
“Natural Cycles is not for the impatient, that’s for sure.”
“You must be consistent with temperature readings and data entry for accuracy.”
“It may take a few months to detect a person’s cycle accurately.”
“It takes some time for the app algorithm to get to know your cycle, so you are likely to get many ‘red’ (potentially fertile) days initially.”
“It can be expensive.”
⚖️ Final Say
Read the summaries of what reviewers think about Natural Cycles below.
“Now that I’ve completed five cycles on Natural Cycles, I can safely say, I’m a fan! That’s not to say there weren’t some sketchy moments those first couple of months when I wondered if I had made a terrible mistake. Natural Cycles is not for the impatient, that’s for sure.”
“While no form of birth control is 100 percent reliable, emerging technology — like Natural Cycles and other fertility awareness apps — can be a useful, effective way to prevent pregnancy. If you decide to use the Natural Cycles app to help you make health decisions, remember that technology can only predict your ovulation days. It cannot guarantee them.”
“Natural Cycles app is marketed as a contraceptive and fertility app, allowing you to use basal body temperature measurements to identify fertile days of your cycle. This information can then be used as birth control (contraceptive) for preventing pregnancy or planning conception. You track your cycle by taking basal body temperature readings ideally 5 or more days per week. The app algorithm uses this information to predict a fertile window for contraceptive or pregnancy planning purposes.”
“Natural Cycles is an FDA-cleared app that can help indicate a person’s fertility window, which can help with birth control and pregnancy planning. An individual needs to take their temperature in the morning, after a period of rest, with a basal thermometer. However, people may not see accurate results until after a few months of data input.”